• Furbag@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Kind of glad I timed my sale of tech sector index funds right at the peak of this bullshit.

  • megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    They were at 20 dollars a share 2 years ago, so, like, still a 3x increase in value since then. Just, dumping all the “Unga bunga! Datacenter carpeting planet!” Over hype valuation

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Something that could be said after Black Tuesday in 1929: The DJIA was under 200 2 years ago, so, like, still a 25% increase in value since then.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        One of the unspoken secrets of the Great Depression. The rich guys still only got richer, even as unemployment skyrocketed and public amenities were gutted.

        The worst years for Wall Street were between the 1940s and 1960s, when the public sector surged and Americans saw the biggest increases in quality of life.

    • 2xar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 hours ago

      They still are the bad guys. But can you remember when they were the good guys? Me neither.

  • abc@suppo.fi
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    Time to buy. Or not. WHO KNOWS.

    Their recent laptop chips have been pretty decent though.

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Well, if the real problem is RAM price, and I’m not convinced it is, more fabs are due to come online late next year. Ram and disk prices will come down eventually. Might be a year or two.

      I’d be more worried that AMD is eating their lunch and will start on their dinner and breakfast before the prices drop again.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        AMD can’t compete with overall demand. They might be a marginal preferred vendor, but there’s still enormous demand in excess of their production capacity.

  • supersquirrel@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    79
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    A factory accident in Israel has shut production long enough to dent server chip shipments, while soaring memory prices are squeezing PC demand. The 28.6% drop erased about $140 billion in value and triggered a wave of downgrades. The stock is still up sharply for 2026, but has now given back about half its value since its June peak.

  • massive_bereavement@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    168
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I always thought that Intel was what kept AMD in place being a cool producer of linux-friendly components, so I pretty much dread the day AMD gets to be free from the shackles of competition.

    • Bluewing@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      The competition has been a boon for us plebe users. And I would expect AMD to continue be Linux friendly if for no other reason it costs them very little to nothing. And they aren’t as intertwined with Microsoft as Intel has been for decades.

        • Big Baby Thor@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          42
          ·
          1 day ago

          This is generally the problem with ISAs.

          ARM has had decades in the oven, x86 has had almost half a century, while RISC-V manufacturing and ISA development has been generally available only a couple of years.

          The fact is if there isn’t a big push by some major vendor - or some nation state, then chances are it’ll develop slower than the previously mentioned ISAs.

          From design, to testing, to prefab, to packaging, it’s all combined just a single step of the journey to improving yield and performance.

          ARM is unfortunately the current trajectory, with Qualcomm, Apple and now NVIDIA leading the charge - which doesn’t bode well, simply because you won’t know what the hell the firmware do.

          We could truly use some market disruption in this space and RISC-V, being an open ISA, would be the safest bet for digital sovereignty and user autonomy - but apparently those things are only important on paper.

          • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 day ago

            Can we make our own RISC-V chips like using FPGAs or something? Or would that be infinitely less robust than anything purpose-built by industry?

            Chinese manufacturers seem to offer plenty of options for RISC-V MCUs and raspberrypi knockoffs, but they seem to be always sold out or they don’t ship to my country

            • Natanael@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              22 hours ago

              The ESP32 series have already switched to RISC-V for most models and many other microcontrollers has too. There’s not a lot in the laptop/desktop territory but with enough incentives it’s gonna happen

              • TheSecondVariety@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                17 hours ago

                Oh ya, the C3 and I think the C5. Not sure what the current versions are but if they’re in esp32’s then I guess that’s pretty main stream, just nowhere near a computer processor just yet.

                Are the RISC-V ESP32’s cheaper than that ARM ones?

              • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                20 hours ago

                Maybe if we all buy RISC-V microprocessors then somebody somewhere will see a little blip in market demand and have the genius idea of producing more full 64-bit RISC-V chips

            • SparroHawc@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 day ago

              FPGAs are going to be way more expensive. It’s possible, but the cost-to-performance ratio would be abysmal.

              • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 day ago

                I see. They’re a little cheaper if you solder them yourself though. Of course soldering 128 leads is no small project and requires some precision. But it’s way cheaper than buying pre-soldered breakout boards.

    • boonhet@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      1 day ago

      Sorry, but AMD stopped pretending to be giving any fucks about the little guy. Lisa has been visiting those Trump AI dinner events. AMD is all in on producing AI hardware first and consumer hardware second.

    • Damage@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      As an European I’m ashamed that we have 0 presence in this market

      • Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        At least Arm is British. Their instruction sets keep getting more popular.

        Though I admit, it’s a little hard for me to estimate how much of a contribution the Arm intellectual property makes to something like an Apple M5 CPU, or Nvidia Grace CPU.

      • AliOski@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Not true. The Netherlands has ASML, sort of a monopoly on the manufacturing of semiconductor machines.

          • AliOski@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Well yeah because that is a near monopoly in Taiwan with TSMC. It is a supply chain and every part in that chain is just as valuable. There is a serious presence of Europe/The Netherlands in the form of ASML in the chip market. It is one of the bargaining chips of the Dutch government when it deals with the United States.

            • Mikrochip@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 hours ago

              Isn’t that just cope, to an extent? Yes, ASML is key to advanced semiconductors, but in a conflict or crisis that disrupts supply chains, who is going to run dry quicker - the ones able to build the thing that’s needed for building fabs, or the ones who actually operate working fabs? My money is on the latter :/

              Also, just because ASML is currently the only one capable of building EUV systems, does not mean it’s guaranteed to stay that way forever. The Chinese sure are trying to follow suit…

              • AliOski@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                6 hours ago

                These are valid worries, never claimed those weren’t the case. However, saying Europe has “no presence in that market” is also not true, the presence is significant.

                Strategically it would be smart to have working fabs in Europe too, it would just take a lot of time and investment. America already started working on it (if I remember correctly) and China is already closing in…

              • Bluewing@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                5 hours ago

                In the case of a war, it would take just one drone to stop production for a very long time in one factory. Factories are big fat juicy targets that can’t move.

                • Mikrochip@feddit.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 hours ago

                  a) I seriously doubt it would be that simple, factories typically don’t stop production like that after a single hit (Perun talked about it recently). And even if a semiconductor fab was that brittle in and of itself, sophisticated air defense and a location deep inside, say, European or Chinese mainland might disagree with this notion. And if one really wanted to, it would be possible to move production underground.

                  b) ‘Conflict’ is what I wrote, not (hot) war. Owning and running semiconductor fabs domestically might well be indispensable in a cold/trade war.

        • Bluewing@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Good bread can be had anywhere. Even in your own kitchen. The best bread I ever had was baked under the crudest of conditions with the barest of utensils and then baked on a hot rock heated in a fire.

          Now cheese on the other hand…

        • Leon@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          19 hours ago

          At least cheese and bread isn’t even on the same playing field in terms of evil.

          • Bluewing@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            I don’t know. Have you ever eaten Wonder Bread or the bread they use for subway sandwiches? If that ain’t evil and vile, I don’t know what is.

      • piccolo@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        21 hours ago

        For x86? I mean, you’d have to suck intels dick for a license. Why not just get NXP to produce desktop ARM chips.

      • ElChinchilla@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        22 hours ago

        I own Irish stock! JamesHardie. I used to have more exposure to a few other european companies but that was a few years ago and cant think of what they were off hand.

    • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      x86 is a dead-end architecture. It can be emulated in software by cheaper, lower-power architectures and live on as a wart.

    • Greg Clarke@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      107
      ·
      1 day ago

      Intel stock is up over 200% over the last 2 years (even with this 29% drop) so it’s way too early to say it’s popped.

      • ramble81@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        ·
        1 day ago

        The fun thing about percentages though: you can have a 10,000% gain, but a 100% drop is an instant wipeout. So a 29% drop can still be more significant than what the value was two years ago.

        • Greg Clarke@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 day ago

          I agree that Intel is overvalued. My point is that you need to zoom out to get a better picture. And a stock that’s up 200% over 2 years is doing really well. It’s funny because your point about percentages was reflected this morning, Intel has slid another 6% so now it’s only up 175% over the past 2 years.

      • r00ty@kbin.life
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yeah it came right down to <$20 at one point. I bought a fair bit in 2025 when it first did, and sold most of it at $100. So you know, I’d not mind if it came back down again to repeat the exercise. Although when I got it 2 years ago, I thought “Not even Trump would let Intel fail” and to be fair, he did authorise a cash boost.

        I am not completely sure that would be true again. I’d probably still take the punt at $20 again though.

        This is a weird one though, because they’ve not even been the biggest name behind AI by anyone’s estimation. Why they took the biggest hit goes beyond AI I think.

        • arudesalad@piefed.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          19 hours ago

          According to this random website I found (at least it has sources) intel still makes 22% of it’s revenue from consumer hardware. So the ram companies making consumer hardware more expensive (or just droping it entirely like micron did) harms intel a lot more than it harms the ram companies.

          Edit: The 22% also includes computers sold to businesses but not data centres

        • ElChinchilla@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 day ago

          I was in at 24-28 and sold at 58-62, definitely okay with a round 2 attempt if it gets back into the mid 20s.

          Randomly another stock ive played the yoyo with is Boeing - BA

          • r00ty@kbin.life
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 day ago

            Yeah, I mean ultimately if I knew the future I could have sold it all at $140 or so. But you don’t really ever know what is happening tomorrow. So ultimately, if you made some return, it’s always good.

    • Elting@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 day ago

      Wait a couple more hours for the trading to open back up and watch what happens to the other tech stocks, they’re either gonna bounce or the floor is gonna fall out of under them.

      • r00ty@kbin.life
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        They’re already up in OOH trading. Not a guarantee they will go back up when US trading opens proper. But, it’s usually a good indication.

        • Elting@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          1 day ago

          What’s the saying, that the market can ignore reality longer than you can remain solvent, or something to that effect.

          • r00ty@kbin.life
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 day ago

            Well it’s certainly rarely based on any logic I can ascertain, that’s for sure.

            • Elting@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 day ago

              It’s really just a gauge of how good the investors are feeling, a real market crash would involve way more than a sell off.

    • [object Object]@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      I just invested a lot of money and reallocated my entire portfolio, so probably.

      (Not in Intel, not in us stocks)

    • SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Yeah they’ve been doing that for years now. If you do what they say, you’ll lose. If you do what they do just faster than they do, you win a trip to the gallows!