• massive_bereavement@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    169
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I always thought that Intel was what kept AMD in place being a cool producer of linux-friendly components, so I pretty much dread the day AMD gets to be free from the shackles of competition.

    • Bluewing@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      The competition has been a boon for us plebe users. And I would expect AMD to continue be Linux friendly if for no other reason it costs them very little to nothing. And they aren’t as intertwined with Microsoft as Intel has been for decades.

      • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        40
        ·
        2 days ago

        Pretty far off but China has some nice manufacturers…or they would if AI didn’t exist.

        • Big Baby Thor@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          42
          ·
          2 days ago

          This is generally the problem with ISAs.

          ARM has had decades in the oven, x86 has had almost half a century, while RISC-V manufacturing and ISA development has been generally available only a couple of years.

          The fact is if there isn’t a big push by some major vendor - or some nation state, then chances are it’ll develop slower than the previously mentioned ISAs.

          From design, to testing, to prefab, to packaging, it’s all combined just a single step of the journey to improving yield and performance.

          ARM is unfortunately the current trajectory, with Qualcomm, Apple and now NVIDIA leading the charge - which doesn’t bode well, simply because you won’t know what the hell the firmware do.

          We could truly use some market disruption in this space and RISC-V, being an open ISA, would be the safest bet for digital sovereignty and user autonomy - but apparently those things are only important on paper.

          • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 days ago

            Can we make our own RISC-V chips like using FPGAs or something? Or would that be infinitely less robust than anything purpose-built by industry?

            Chinese manufacturers seem to offer plenty of options for RISC-V MCUs and raspberrypi knockoffs, but they seem to be always sold out or they don’t ship to my country

            • Natanael@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              2 days ago

              The ESP32 series have already switched to RISC-V for most models and many other microcontrollers has too. There’s not a lot in the laptop/desktop territory but with enough incentives it’s gonna happen

              • TheSecondVariety@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                Oh ya, the C3 and I think the C5. Not sure what the current versions are but if they’re in esp32’s then I guess that’s pretty main stream, just nowhere near a computer processor just yet.

                Are the RISC-V ESP32’s cheaper than that ARM ones?

              • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                Maybe if we all buy RISC-V microprocessors then somebody somewhere will see a little blip in market demand and have the genius idea of producing more full 64-bit RISC-V chips

            • SparroHawc@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              2 days ago

              FPGAs are going to be way more expensive. It’s possible, but the cost-to-performance ratio would be abysmal.

              • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 days ago

                I see. They’re a little cheaper if you solder them yourself though. Of course soldering 128 leads is no small project and requires some precision. But it’s way cheaper than buying pre-soldered breakout boards.

    • boonhet@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      2 days ago

      Sorry, but AMD stopped pretending to be giving any fucks about the little guy. Lisa has been visiting those Trump AI dinner events. AMD is all in on producing AI hardware first and consumer hardware second.

    • Damage@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      As an European I’m ashamed that we have 0 presence in this market

      • AliOski@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 days ago

        Not true. The Netherlands has ASML, sort of a monopoly on the manufacturing of semiconductor machines.

          • AliOski@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            Well yeah because that is a near monopoly in Taiwan with TSMC. It is a supply chain and every part in that chain is just as valuable. There is a serious presence of Europe/The Netherlands in the form of ASML in the chip market. It is one of the bargaining chips of the Dutch government when it deals with the United States.

            • Mikrochip@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              Isn’t that just cope, to an extent? Yes, ASML is key to advanced semiconductors, but in a conflict or crisis that disrupts supply chains, who is going to run dry quicker - the ones able to build the thing that’s needed for building fabs, or the ones who actually operate working fabs? My money is on the latter :/

              Also, just because ASML is currently the only one capable of building EUV systems, does not mean it’s guaranteed to stay that way forever. The Chinese sure are trying to follow suit…

              • AliOski@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 day ago

                These are valid worries, never claimed those weren’t the case. However, saying Europe has “no presence in that market” is also not true, the presence is significant.

                Strategically it would be smart to have working fabs in Europe too, it would just take a lot of time and investment. America already started working on it (if I remember correctly) and China is already closing in…

                • Mikrochip@feddit.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  20 hours ago

                  Fair, the world is rather nuanced after all. And you’re right, there is indeed some presence there. I’m not convinced every part of the supply chain holds equal value, but that’s subjective, I suppose.

                  Strategically it would be smart to have working fabs in Europe too, it would just take a lot of time and investment. America already started working on it (if I remember correctly) and China is already closing in…

                  Yeah, I wish. Our (=German) previous minister of economic affairs tried doing that, but a combination of Intel (maybe not the best choice in hindsight, but I don’t blame him for that) and the government getting replaced by the current one lead by our beloved Friedrich Merz (yay Neoliberalism) put a stop to that for the foreseeable future. At least we still have some semiconductor manufacturing in Europe, that should make any potential catching up much easier than it otherwise would be.

              • Bluewing@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                In the case of a war, it would take just one drone to stop production for a very long time in one factory. Factories are big fat juicy targets that can’t move.

                • Mikrochip@feddit.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 day ago

                  a) I seriously doubt it would be that simple, factories typically don’t stop production like that after a single hit (Perun talked about it recently). And even if a semiconductor fab was that brittle in and of itself, sophisticated air defense and a location deep inside, say, European or Chinese mainland might disagree with this notion. And if one really wanted to, it would be possible to move production underground.

                  b) ‘Conflict’ is what I wrote, not (hot) war. Owning and running semiconductor fabs domestically might well be indispensable in a cold/trade war.

                  • Bluewing@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 day ago

                    There ain’t no difference between the smell of dead bodies in the sun in a “conflict” or a “war”.

                    And yes infrastructure IS that brittle. Just ask the Russians about Ukrainian drone attacks. And there is NO place on this earth that a missile can’t reach.

        • Bluewing@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Good bread can be had anywhere. Even in your own kitchen. The best bread I ever had was baked under the crudest of conditions with the barest of utensils and then baked on a hot rock heated in a fire.

          Now cheese on the other hand…

        • Leon@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          At least cheese and bread isn’t even on the same playing field in terms of evil.

          • Bluewing@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            I don’t know. Have you ever eaten Wonder Bread or the bread they use for subway sandwiches? If that ain’t evil and vile, I don’t know what is.

      • Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        At least Arm is British. Their instruction sets keep getting more popular.

        Though I admit, it’s a little hard for me to estimate how much of a contribution the Arm intellectual property makes to something like an Apple M5 CPU, or Nvidia Grace CPU.

      • piccolo@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        For x86? I mean, you’d have to suck intels dick for a license. Why not just get NXP to produce desktop ARM chips.

      • ElChinchilla@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I own Irish stock! JamesHardie. I used to have more exposure to a few other european companies but that was a few years ago and cant think of what they were off hand.

    • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      x86 is a dead-end architecture. It can be emulated in software by cheaper, lower-power architectures and live on as a wart.