Apparently WD and Seagate stock have already taken a hit at the announcement.

  • Gerudo@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I just want affordable storage again in the single digit TB drives, maybe low teens. I waited too long to build a multi drive nas and now I have regerts.

    • rbos@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Yeah, 2TB SSDs are honestly fine for everything except bulk storage.

    • Björn@swg-empire.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      4 hours ago

      When my 4 TB drive died ~15 years ago I thought to myself I’d just wait a few months and replace it with 8 TB for the same price. Then the floods happened.

      Then prices almost were finally at that level again. And then AI started gobbling everything up.

  • Zedstrian@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    89
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Good that Toshiba saw the increase in demand as an opportunity to increase sales volume, rather than price gouge their customers. Hopefully they gain market share.

    • Ludicrous0251@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      IDK, it’s pretty risky. Doubling production means youre taking a bet that the bubble is not going to burst.

      • Damage@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Hard disks will always have demand, we need more every day and they have a limited lifespan

      • [object Object]@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I’m pretty behind what I want for drives, and modern dev practices of storing tons of intermediate container build artifacts, and a resurgence of arrrborists will probably soak up drive demand even if prices fall.

      • LaLuzDelSol@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        That is a fair point, especially with things that are very hard to set production for like processors.

  • Kjell@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    7 hours ago

    The good, more HDDs and bigger drives.
    The bad, they will directly to data centers.

    • halcyoncmdr@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Consumers aren’t buying large drives like this, those are intended for data centers. And if they’re increasing production aimed at those capacities, that means smaller capacity stock opening up for consumers.

  • yesman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I don’t hoard video files, so 1TB still seems unimaginably vast. I was shocked when I learned my entire CD collection, ripped to FLAC, would fit on my phone. 100TB is like a billion dollars, my mind has difficulty understanding numbers that large.

    • zurohki@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      6 hours ago

      You get games that are several hundred gigabytes these days - high resolution art assets are big.

      Filling up a 1TB drive is easy. 100TB, yeah, that’s a lot of space.

      Don’t count bytes, look at what they can store: 1TB will hold like four to eight recent AAA games.

    • Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Really depends on what you store. If you archive videogames like i do, 100TB is a good place to be, and redundancy means you need more than one.

    • dalekcaan@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Even if you do need 100 TB of storage, I feel like it’d be a lot better to have multiple smaller drives rather than one massive one. To be fair, though, I’d expect such large drives to be targeted mostly to commercial customers.

        • Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 hours ago

          I’m in a smaller, but similar boat with my 40TB. A few of the drives are pretty old now, and i would prefer swapping them out before they die.

      • SkyNTP@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Large drives are convenient for 3 2 1 backup. Not all your storage needs or even should be ssd or raid 5.

        • Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 hours ago

          You should’ve been backing things up already.

          “If you have one, you have none”.

          Without proper backup your data is just waiting to disappear at the first unrecoverable failure.

    • sbird@retrofed.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      Larger storage is good for videos (think Blu-rays, 4K videos are very big! Security camera feeds could also take up lots of space), and you might also want to host for multiple users (for family, friends, or a business)

      But yes, _100_TB is a lot. 8-24TB (before memory became super expensive) was reasonable for most consumers, usually in a RAID configuration for redundancy. Multiple smaller drives are more reliable and modular than a single big one!

    • 9point6@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Without going into video media, I’ve got around 2-3TB of photos (in RAW format) and my ripped/downloaded music collection is about the same size. Probably got about 5TB of device backups and a similar amount of retro games ROMs/disk images

      I think between my desktop PC and server I’ve got about 70-80TB of storage (though not all of it is usable for redundancy)

      I could see myself building a new NAS in a couple of years that would make use of a few of those drives if the economics work out

  • tidderuuf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I’ve had good reliability from Toshiba in the past few years. I hope they can keep it up.