Apparently WD and Seagate stock have already taken a hit at the announcement.

  • dalekcaan@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Even if you do need 100 TB of storage, I feel like it’d be a lot better to have multiple smaller drives rather than one massive one. To be fair, though, I’d expect such large drives to be targeted mostly to commercial customers.

      • Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I’m in a smaller, but similar boat with my 40TB. A few of the drives are pretty old now, and i would prefer swapping them out before they die.

    • SkyNTP@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Large drives are convenient for 3 2 1 backup. Not all your storage needs or even should be ssd or raid 5.

      • Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        You should’ve been backing things up already.

        “If you have one, you have none”.

        Without proper backup your data is just waiting to disappear at the first unrecoverable failure.