• who@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      Flatpak’s sandboxing is not sufficient to protect against hostile software.

      And even if it were, I would not be inclined to run software from Epic.

      • Victor@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Can you detail specifically why it isn’t sufficient? Because I thought you could restrict which directories a Flatpak software could access down to the level of single, specific directories?

    • EnsignWashout@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Yes. I’m happy it’s a FlatPak, but I’m still not 100% sure I understand and trust flatpak’s sandbox to put Epic Games Launcher on my PC.

      I’m way more likely to trust it as a FlatPak than any other way.

      But I think I’m still at no, because it’s Epic.