• Damage@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 hours ago

    PC manufacturers should grow some balls and tell RAM suppliers to lower the price or lose their business forever.

  • adarza@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    3 hours ago

    My base starting point parts list (full build with 9800x3d, 64GB/4TB, 9700xt) was 2000usd about five months ago when it was last used to base a build on.

    It’s currently ‘down’ to about 3400 after peaking last week at over 3500. The excess is nearly entirely from RAM and SSD prices.

      • starblursd@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        Double the ram that YOU realistically need but maybe not of the RAM that they need… perhaps they do more than just gaming?

    • qupada@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 hours ago

      35% is the kind of numbers I used to have on servers at work, which often feature >2TB of RAM.

      (another similar percentage being the CPUs, 128 cores per socket doesn’t come cheap)

      Seeing those numbers for desktop hardware, “holy fuck” is about right.

      • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        For data center shit, it’s probably up in the 70-80% range (unless you’re also running shitloads of H100s or A100s or whatever top of the line is these days)

      • Gladaed@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Yeah. Scientific and high performance compute are really eating it on ram prices right now.

        And using less memory is much harder than just opening fewer browser tabs.

        Software is designed to eat memory for it was very cheap in the past. Well, comparatively.