• Ludicrous0251@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      48 minutes ago

      Back in my day when RAM was cheap, 8GB is worthless, 16GB is minimum spec to do anything remotely productive, 32GB covers 98% of scenarios, and 64GB is ehh why not at least this way I never have to worry about it.

    • starblursd@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      Double the ram that YOU realistically need but maybe not of the RAM that they need… perhaps they do more than just gaming?

      • Gladaed@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        49 minutes ago

        What could they possibly do that needs that much RAM that does not provide an income.

        64 GB is more than just a bit of extra memory. 32 is enough even if you are running docker containers.

        Just buying RAM for the sake of it and then complaining about lack of affordability is not a helpful thing. Yes RAM was cheap so people did that. But you can just not do that and be mostly fine.

        • Fizz@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          21 minutes ago

          I personally use like 40gb of ram opening up city skylines and rimworld before I started compressing textures. VMs, video editing, 3d modeling are all ram demons and are all hobbies people have.

          There are plenty of workloads that need 64 to 128 gb of ram.