• lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      XMPP!

      Stoat is dead in the water due to dependency on the UK and not an easy solution to deploy yet.

      Fluxer is dead in the water due to license.

      • k0e3@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I don’t get why so many people are saying this. Afaik, it doesn’t have channels within servers like Discord and Slack, which I feel is a defining feature in the text chat part of the apps.

        • lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          52 minutes ago

          channels within servers

          Oh that is like the second most common thing on XMPP! It’s rooms/chats/conversations on servers/conferences/salons, etc. Like, come on, even IRC has that and that was made before I was born.

          The one thing that’s complex, or at least bad in the UI I’ve seen for most XMPP clients, is that searchability of rooms is not very good. Like, discoverability is, but to my knowledge there’s no way to actually filter for rooms based on a keyword, you either get the whole roomlist for a server or nothing.

    • Seefern@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Me either tbh so I did a bit of digging and found that stoat has been around a bit longer and (I know this is a dumb metric for this) seems to have more stars and forks on their github which indicates to me it’ll be around longer.

      That said, fluxer has nicer UI imo and I think it has a few more features so it might outdo stoat in the future idk.

      Ultimately, I think both are great and likely to be around for a while so just pick one and go with it. They both are open source, use the same license and all that. So you can’t go wrong.

      • paequ2@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        7 hours ago

        One thing that worries me a little about fluxer is this:

        Finally, we can offer commercial licences to companies that want to run Fluxer internally without being bound by the AGPLv3 copyleft terms. This is enabled via a contributor-friendly CLA, but it doesn’t create a separate “enterprise edition”. It’s still the same Fluxer software everyone else uses.

        They have a CLA on contributions. So while today Fluxer is licensed as AGPLv3, tomorrow they can pull the rug and change the license, just like everyone else has been doing.