Like the cartel will allow the prices to fall even if there was more RAM available.

  • j5y7@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    13 hours ago

    A lot of data center stuff was on the ballots and quite a lot of it was rejected by voters. They may not be able to use the RAM they’re hoarding. If investors pull out of AI, they’ll have no choice but to sell it off to pay the bills.

    I’m not real savvy on this stuff though, so it’s just an uneducated guess of mine.

    • adarza@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      12 hours ago

      they will just build where they haven’t been rejected, or where locals are more receptive of bribery, token offers of a new park or somesuch, or buyouts on their property

      • JasSmith@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I read some research showing the average local voter was amenable to a $10k bribe. I think locals should be negotiating for electricity price caps. E.g. 10c/kWh. Anything over that is paid for by the data center owner. This puts money into the pockets of all locals over a long period of time, and insulated them from the demand surge causing price spikes all over the US.

      • ルルㇲ@retrofed.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        gamer zeitgeist already forgot Google illegally destroyed a forest in order to erect a datacenter.
        gamers truly have the RAM of a goldfish.