• 392 Posts
  • 196 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 30th, 2023

help-circle
































  • That’s what the tech was touted as over a decade ago when this started with both DLSS and FSR. Give an extension of life to your older cards.

    Currently that’s not what it used for, it’s now a tool that allows developers to not give a crap about optimizing the game or creating textures and models that look good out of the box. Now it’s THE tool that will get you up to 60 fps with a GPU that has a ton of expensive RAM because developers don’t have to care just let AI make it’s guess, better have money because screw your low end gaming, it’s THE tool to ensure that native rendering and models don’t have to be good, just slap on what you want it to look like and let AI do the rest, artists intention be damned.

    With it running on two 5090’s, and yeah, yeah, they said it’ll run on one card and we all should believe corporations, it looks like their little way of starting to make owning a gaming computer too expensive for anyone and why don’t you just subscribe to our cloud gaming instead where you can rent out the capability we decide to give you. Call me cynical but that’s what I’m seeing here.







  • Given this history that FSR 4 was proven to have been able to be supported in RDNA 3 and 2 via a unintentional commit by AMD and the intrepid open source community implemented FSR 4 on these cards giving them much improved visual quality with a minor loss in frame rate and that this rumour is coming from a reliable source that has a history of being correct with their leaks, I’m inclined to distrust this corporation and start sharpening my tines.

    And don’t get me started on how AMD has dropped linux support, another competitive advantage, and we’re relying on open source coders to give us FSR 4 capability while Nvidia, the current god father of fucking over gamers, has been increasing linux driver support.

    But hey, we all have our opinions based on our observations.


  • I’m going to get downvoted but honestly I’m not 100% against some form of digital ID. I don’t think these half baked, unthought through state laws and patchwork state systems are anyway way to go about it though and they certainly do not have enough safeguards in their laws to limit surveillance which I’m sure there are those who crafted the laws to intentionally leave that out and they certainly didn’t have any inkling of cybersecurity in mind when they proposed these laws.

    I mean we in the modern age already have a crap ton of digital ID’s flying around using our NFC enabled devices and 2FA systems commercially and we mostly don’t blink a single eye on these systems and generally regard them as a safer alternative now. And let’s not pretend that these corporations aren’t tracking the living heck out of us already with this.