Small sample set aside, the performance differences here are much bigger than I’ve seen in previous linux comparisons. Something has to be off right? Curious if anyone is able to reproduce these results.

  • KickMeElmo@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    Makes me wonder how it compares to Garuda, which is more gaming-tailored and has a graphical installer.

    • Holytimes@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Garuda suffers from having absolutely dog shit defaults and tools compared to cachy for new Linux users.

      Not even talking visuals.

      Cachys custom scripts, tools and helpers make Garuda look like a fucking joke from a professionalism standpoint. And makes cachy infinity easier to get going and use day to day for a new Linux user.

      Cachyos is about as new user friendly as you can physically get on arch short of SteamOS.

      If your an advanced user then both Garuda and cachy might as well be carbon copies. Its just a starting point for us. Everything’s getting fiddled with anyways

      • Cybersteel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        16 hours ago

        How about endeavour. That has a graphical interface for an arch install. Been using it for a few years already after windows 10.

      • ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Garuda defaults feel like you’re fixing someone else’s computer and you have to remove all the toolbars