9WhiteTeeth

Well, you are making up head cannon. Check my profile, there’s a Pixelfed link. I’m an artist not an engineer.

Like…?

I happen to agree w the developer that peoples’ problem w AI is actually a problem w Capitalism

Accountability for what!? You people have lost your minds.

Yeah I do. This is a small, volunteer, open source developer creating something for our benefit & has found a way to ease their workload but the purity brigade demands they type everything out by hand from scratch b/c they have big feels & are reflexively reactionary about AI. Seems shitty to me.

Okay. I guess you want the volunteer open source dev to write everything by hand from scratch so it will pass your high standards. That’s on you, honestly.

Lord Almighty the reactionary hate is so goddamn stupid.

They are making the point that you won’t be able to tell the difference. & It’s a salient one.

Two things, the experiment you are referring to was specifically designed to deceive whereas AI vulnerabilities would just be simple bugs.

Secondly, the security requirements of the Linux Kernel are way more important/stringent than Lutris, which has no special access & is often even further sandboxed if installed via Flatpak.

I just don’t see this as an issue until it proves to be one. People are always welcome to fork a “pure” version.

You are assuming the author is being unsafe & not auditing code for very basic security issues.

Let me present this angle, small teams of volunteer open source developers finally have a way to help ease the amount of code they produce, but you want them to continue doing all the work manually because AI hurts your feefees.

Further, you are openly declaring you don’t trust the devs to audit their own code.

If you can find a security vulnerability in the code (it is open source after all) I’ll cede, but otherwise, I think it is a good thing responsible AI use can help shoulder the work these folks do for our benefit.

Holy purity test I think people in this thread are slightly over reacting.