If not, will you buy games knowingly it could contain or have been made with Ai, or will you research before? If you research, why not do this with Steam games?
I looked at pages on GOG games and couldn’t find such disclosure. As far as I know, itchio doesn’t have a policy to force Ai disclosure either. Right now, Steam is the only platform that forces this.
Steam has been the only platform I’ve really bought from since all this bullshit started, but if they drop the policy I’m dropping the platform as a customer. It shouldn’t be on me to research the shit out of stuff to make sure it’s a real product that someone actually made, that should absolutely be disclosed on every platform there is.
Whatever slopped out jackass is downvoting this can get bent: I’m not paying for poorly plagiarized garbage, full stop.
From the article (though it doesn’t explicitly say that) and from people (read: idiots like Tim Sweeney) criticizing the policy. There is very real pressure from a certain group of shitbags for Steam to abandon the warning labels or at least not make them mandatory, which is fucked.
Those aren’t real source, these are just someone idea. There is absolutely no indication to Valve dropping the requirement for Ai disclosure, and I don’t see any reason to why they would to. It’s one of the quality features of Steam and something others don’t do. It’s just transparency, not forcing anything else.
They won’t drop it, but developers will stop disclosing it. There’s no benefit to doing so. Only downsides. It’s only a matter of time until AI is so ubiquitous that no one can tell who is and who isn’t using it.
If you can’t tell, then it literally doesn’t matter. If it’s information that is invisible to you, and if someone lied about it you would still never know, then it shouldn’t inform your decision-making. At all.
In Linux, as far as I can tell, AI was used in certain ways, but I wouldn’t call it slop in this instance because it’s not janky garbage and there was still plenty of human oversight. I’m not a fan of calling LLMs “AI” at all, but it’s still an important distinction.
That said, AI use should still be always disclosed including how it was used and it should be 100% mandatory in everything from games to operating systems to drug synthesis.
I don’t want to buy slop so if they don’t REQUIRE a slop identifier, I’m just not going to buy games from them anymore. It’ll be GOG or the high seas!
They do make you disclose the usage.
What they won’t do is ban any games based on it
This lets the consumers decide, when you can just filter out all have that use it
As long as it is required to be labeled, which it currently is as I understand it, Steam will keep me as a customer.
Except Steam doesn’t have filters for LLM content. That’s why so many people had problems with Next Fest
Does GOG have required Ai disclosure?
If not, will you buy games knowingly it could contain or have been made with Ai, or will you research before? If you research, why not do this with Steam games?
Hadn’t looked into it yet but if there’s slop there then won’t be buying, same goes for Itch.io or any other platform.
I looked at pages on GOG games and couldn’t find such disclosure. As far as I know, itchio doesn’t have a policy to force Ai disclosure either. Right now, Steam is the only platform that forces this.
Steam has been the only platform I’ve really bought from since all this bullshit started, but if they drop the policy I’m dropping the platform as a customer. It shouldn’t be on me to research the shit out of stuff to make sure it’s a real product that someone actually made, that should absolutely be disclosed on every platform there is.
Whatever slopped out jackass is downvoting this can get bent: I’m not paying for poorly plagiarized garbage, full stop.
Where does this “dropping the Ai policy” come from?? There is no indication to.
From the article (though it doesn’t explicitly say that) and from people (read: idiots like Tim Sweeney) criticizing the policy. There is very real pressure from a certain group of shitbags for Steam to abandon the warning labels or at least not make them mandatory, which is fucked.
Those aren’t real source, these are just someone idea. There is absolutely no indication to Valve dropping the requirement for Ai disclosure, and I don’t see any reason to why they would to. It’s one of the quality features of Steam and something others don’t do. It’s just transparency, not forcing anything else.
They won’t drop it, but developers will stop disclosing it. There’s no benefit to doing so. Only downsides. It’s only a matter of time until AI is so ubiquitous that no one can tell who is and who isn’t using it.
Ok. Have a good day!
If you can’t tell, then it literally doesn’t matter. If it’s information that is invisible to you, and if someone lied about it you would still never know, then it shouldn’t inform your decision-making. At all.
The hell it doesn’t! What an absurd response.
Yours is the absurd response.
You: “It’s so poorly plagiarized, and so slop quality that I need them to tell me so, otherwise I don’t actually know. So make them tell me!”
Asinine.
Yes, I agree: everything you’ve said so far is pretty asinine.
There is AI slop in both the Windows and Linux kernel now, so you’re complicit either way.
Ah, yes, let’s just have everything go to shit because things can’t be absolutely perfect!
You don’t have to use modern windows or Linux. Is you so, that’s your choice.
I highly recommend NOT using modern windows. Not just because of LLM slop, that’s only the tip I if the iceberg.
using unsupported software in October, 2026 is certainly a choice
signed, someone on Windows 10 which will soon be out of LTS
There is 100% AI slop in Windows.
In Linux, as far as I can tell, AI was used in certain ways, but I wouldn’t call it slop in this instance because it’s not janky garbage and there was still plenty of human oversight. I’m not a fan of calling LLMs “AI” at all, but it’s still an important distinction.
That said, AI use should still be always disclosed including how it was used and it should be 100% mandatory in everything from games to operating systems to drug synthesis.