As something of a developer myself, I’d argue he has a developer-centric take. He’s probably more focused on profits.

I’d say a developer wants to create a quality product rather than hastily cobbled together slop. Especially when we’re talking about asset generation. Sure, you save money and time by churning out generic AI assets, but you gain quality from an actual artist. I guess improvements on the Epic Store are exactly that.

Funny how the greedy of the gaming industry never understand that quality gets them money rather than quantity.

So, if a dev uses AI, they fail because of haters, but they also win because they’re more productive than devs that don’t?

Being strong and weak at the same time is always a fun rhetoric.

Also, afaik, Valve only asks for disclosure of generative AI for asset generation, not productivity tools like coding assistance.

Isn’t breaking labor laws pretty much standard practice in the games industry anyways?

Not that that’s a good thing. Just saying.