• audaxdreik@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Is it though? The previous actor reprising their role is always a kinda nice little thing to have, but far from necessary. That role could go to someone else who would receive the pay, credit, and experience; and I think arguably it should.

    Everyone is hungry for a “legitimate” use case and I don’t think this is it.

    • shiroininja@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Sometimes a change of voice actor completely puts me off of a series. Or the change of an actor in a show. Case: the Witcher tv series

    • loppy@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Well, if you read the article, the entire issue is that this is an expansion of the game which will be intermixed with 1000s of lines of dialogue of the actor’s old voice. Hiring a new person does not solve the problem of having the old voice lines mixed with new voice lines. Further, they are also planning to make an entire new game after this expansion, and the impression I get from the article is that they are happy to use the original actor with his new voice for that, and he’s happy to do it; so again it makes no sense to hire someone new.

    • NekoKoneko@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Well, you can feel sympathy for either actor, but it’s not like a new actor is any more entitled to the role, and someone with medical issues who can’t work the same way seems to call for some accommodations.

      Either option prioritizes helping a real actor versus replacing them, so I think it’s neutral - but that implies a legitimate use case.