• Orygin@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    17 hours ago

    The market has spoken, no one has been able to provide a better service for less, so 30 stays. Technically they could even have increased the cut because of that if you follow market rules.

    But even then, you can get a lower cut on Steam if you are a very big publisher, so the 30% figure is not set in stone.

    And again, the market is not gaming as a whole but gaming platforms, of which there are very few players, and none have tried to really compete with steam as a platform. Most publishers platforms were entirely driven by maximizing their profit, not competing. Most of them are basic digital storefronts, and not platforms.

    • Agent_Karyo@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      Totally! The market has spoken!

      It just so happens that all major service providers have the same 30% figure irrespective of their specific vertical focus, the geographic component of their industry or even the developments in their vertical over the past 20-25 years?

      That’s how a market works! Right?

      P.S. You can also set it to 100% (you physical can if you want), that’s not what we are discussing though.

      • Orygin@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        16 hours ago

        You’re free to build your own platform to undercut Valve and others if you think the market is wrong. Epic has been trying (barely I know) but haven’t succeeded afaik