• klankin@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    105
    ·
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    The kernel has a ton of optional modules that they’d be stupid to include them all. They certainly don’t need support for an obscure Quebec companies GPUs that stopped producing in the 90s.

    Its pretty standard operating to cut out any cruft you can, saves on storage, boot times, etc. This one was probably saving milliseconds and kilobytes, so presumably not much thought was given to disabling it, nor needed to reenable it.

    • massive_bereavement@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      68
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Again?! An unwarranted attack by the anglophones against the Québécois GPU artisans!

      L’enterrement de cyber-crapaud!!

    • BassTurd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      13 hours ago

      The existence of it also adds another potential attack vector for hackers. It’s unlikely that this would be a real problem, but any additional software is just another place that could be exploited.

      • klankin@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Thats a really good point, especially with the more obscure modules.

        It must be interesting for steam to develop a hackable device in a market that usually locks their hardware down so aggressively.

        • Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          8 hours ago

          I mean just because steam doesn’t mind you tinkering with their own hardware doesn’t mean they should not try to secure the base system OS against outside intrusion (like a RAT entering in via an AUR installation using modules as an entry point)

          • klankin@piefed.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Yeah, sorry I meant more in the way that a user in a VM is a really different threat surface to a full root user.

            For sure both should apply security patches, and avoid malware, I’m just wondering even within that model what the differences are.

    • woelkchen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      The kernel has a ton of optional modules that they’d be stupid to include them all.

      True but part of Valve’s marketing for Frame is the expansion slot, so at least peripherals compatible with ARM hardware were probably meant to be enabled and this was an oversight.

      • klankin@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Thats valid, and due to the speed of the update I wouldn’t be surprised if it was already in their testing suite.

      • klankin@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Still needs to be read from disk/flash, for the kernel to know it exists. And more relevantly every module has a number of dependencies that will all contribute to size/boot times in their own way.

        Maybe even milliseconds is giving it too much, but bloat is really important especially near the release of new hardware.

        I imagine the last thing anyone was worried about in crunch time was if they enabled enough random hardware in their config file.