• eleijeep@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    87
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    23 hours ago

    The port is here: https://github.com/alexkid77/openlara_esp32p4
    and the author’s name is Alejandro Villegas Alonso.

    But because he posted a video of his project on YouTube, PCGamer reduces him to the name of the platform he posted on: “YouTuber.”

    The author of this article will henceforth be referred to as “PCGamerer.”

    • MurrayL@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      hardware creator Alejandro Villegas Alonso shared a clip of classic Tomb Raider running from a low-power chip

      He’s fully credited in the article text. Perfectly normal to not give a full name in a title unless they’re a well known public figure (and even then it’s often shortened to one name if possible).

      • eleijeep@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Yeah but YouTuber is a weird way to describe someone just because that’s where you saw their project. His account has 200 subscribers. He could equally be referred to as a GitHubber or Linkediner.

        Personally i would have just said “engineer” or “programmer.”

  • swicano@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    1 day ago

    Lol I’ve got a esp32-p4 and I struggled to get the included example working. So. We’re basically the same.

    It’s a very impressive chip but Tomb Raider, wow that’s fantastic

  • ramenshaman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Microcontrollers have gotten sooo powerful. I started out using 16 MHz arduinos but today my favorite one (Teensy 4.0/4.1) runs at 600 MHz and can be over clocked to 1 GHz.

    • criticon@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Just last week I got a teensy 4.1 and I’m impressed, it even includes 3 channels for CAN communication so I’ve been using for some work projects

  • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    a 32 bit dual core cpu is probably way more powerful than the low-mhz scale one it originally ran on?

    • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      Tomb raider 1996 was a primary title for the Sega Saturn which used hitachi superH 32bit RISC processors at 28mhz and 2m RAM. A little more digging lists the minimum PC requirements for the DOS/win9x version to be a Pentium 60 and 8m RAM.

      Not even counting that overall instructions per clock has increased tremendously since the 90s, yeah, there’s plenty of power in an esp32 at 400mhz lol

      • ripcord@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        13 hours ago

        The ESP32 seems to even do more MIPS per Mhz that the original Pentium, so it’s even faster than a 400mhz pentium would be. Computationally at least

        Edit: apparently the Pentium was actually much faster at 64-bit floating point calculations (ESP32 has to do 2 32-bit operations and combine in software), but I don’t think that’s an issue here

        Guess it depends on how tomb raider was written. Even on 32-bit CPUs games like quake were still doing 64-bit math

      • DdCno1@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        18 hours ago

        This reminds me of very early mobile ports of this game for Pocket PC PDAs from 2002.

        Allow me to geek out a little: The two least powerful of the officially supported devices - Compaq iPAQ 3630 and Toshiba e310 - feature a 32bit ARM-based RISC CPU clocked at 206 MHz, paired with 32 MB of RAM and a 240 x 320 display. The Toshiba cost $899 when it came out in October of 2002, equivalent to $1661 in today’s money (in other words, way too much for a kid who desperately wanted one back then).

        Here’s the interesting part though: This CPU - the Intel StrongARM SA-1110 (yes, Intel used to license ARM CPUs)- has a TDP of less than 400 mW when clocked at 206 MHz. This is without RAM, of course, but still, this was a very power-efficient chip for the time - and it could take up tasks that were usually done by other chips, like acting as a softmodem.