• paraphrand@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Would an API specification be acceptable? I’m surprised they are demanding source code at all.

    • Meruten@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      23 hours ago

      Any workable solution will do. The source code request is to counter the argument that adapting end of life plans are too expensive/make the product finiancially unviable. If you release the source code and leave the community to figure it out themselves, it costs you nothing.

      • paraphrand@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Cool. A full specification seems fair. I wonder how much copyright would hinder their goals here for forcing the full code. And I could see companies eventually constructing licensing and other structures that basically mean every bit of the core functionally of the server is actually licensed from or provided by a vendor as a shield.

        Could the code be released but encumbered by licenses or copyright? Seems like something else to navigate.

        I support the idea of games not being killed. I just find the demands very surprising. And can see why this is an uphill battle.