It does not, and that was not the intent with what I said.
I’m saying piracy (in general, as a practice) is preservation, because torrents help preserve media since they inherently allow for more resilient, redundant, decentralized hosting that isn’t reliant on a provider, like Myrient, which can just shut down.
What I’m not saying is that piracy and torrenting are the same thing, that torrents are only for piracy, or that this is piracy.
If libraries did not exist and you purposed them today, you would be labeled a pirate and likely used into oblivion by the 3 or 4 massive companies that “own” all media. It’s not strange that there is an overlap in the tools needed to preserve media in a robust, distributed way, and the tools used to distribute movies, music, and books.
This is why piracy is preservation. Torrents are just really damn good for this sort of thing.
This equivocates piracy and bittorrent tech as stated. That’s lame.
It does not, and that was not the intent with what I said.
I’m saying piracy (in general, as a practice) is preservation, because torrents help preserve media since they inherently allow for more resilient, redundant, decentralized hosting that isn’t reliant on a provider, like Myrient, which can just shut down.
What I’m not saying is that piracy and torrenting are the same thing, that torrents are only for piracy, or that this is piracy.
If libraries did not exist and you purposed them today, you would be labeled a pirate and likely used into oblivion by the 3 or 4 massive companies that “own” all media. It’s not strange that there is an overlap in the tools needed to preserve media in a robust, distributed way, and the tools used to distribute movies, music, and books.