Is already hanging there for a while…

  • 7EP6vuI@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    1 day ago

    i’m a bit disappointed in wero: they want to be a european alternative, but you can only use it on devices with an operating system controlled by us companies.

    i don’t understand why they can not make it work in a browser? what are the technical limitations?

    • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      They are aiming at e-commerce next so I guess the next step will be handling payments in a browser.

      Also, if it’s integrated with your bank account, can you sent transfers from you bank’s web portal? I can do it with Bizum which is pretty much Spanish Wero.

    • cageythree@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I would love to accept it in my store, but my terminal provider just said they wouldn’t implement it.

      Your comment just made me look it up again and with payone there now seems to be a German provider that supports it. Guess I consider changing to them at the end of my current contract, they cost about the same as my current one.

      • it_depends_man@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        I mean, I’m mostly meme’ing, I will never touch it. I think it’s hilarious that they do all that marketing and it’s simply not functional yet.

        I do sincerely wish you good luck and that it works for you though.

        • cageythree@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          Yea true.

          Personally, my biggest issue with it is that it’s tying one bank account and one phone number (at least with my bank, I’ve heard that other banks tie it to email addresses).
          I have multiple bank accounts (one for each business plus personal ones), but only one mobile phone number. So I can only get and send wero payments with just one bank account. I cannot get/send business and personal payments simultaneously, and even if I activated it for one business, it still wouldn’t work for the other.
          I could only get more phone numbers, but they cost monthly, and I’m not willing to do that just for a niche payment service.

          I’m still feeling positive that they even work on alternatives. But you’re absolutely right, it isn’t really functional right now and money should be put into development rather than marketing/user growth for now.

          • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            15 hours ago

            I’m just going to keep on using SEPA CT. It’s more convenient for me. In fact it’s superior to wero in many ways, it’s European, and all EU banks support it AFAIK

          • androidul@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            tying it to phone number is no biggie, look at UPI, they’ve been doing it since inception

            • cageythree@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              16 hours ago

              Well when a phone number can only be used for one bank account, but someone has more bank accounts than phone numbers (which is the case for a lot of people) then it is an issue because they can’t use wero with all accounts.

      • MatSeFi@lemmy.liebeleu.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        There is some momentum right now for sure. But the tracker is tracking what? Some selection of shops? Common two digit numbers of shops? Over all Europe.? Are they kidding.

        But still a nice project

    • redditmademedoit@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I think governments should just release a privacy respecting token that can be transferred physically between parties without the need for facilitation or interference by any third party. Preferably, the tokens should be tied to a shared unit of account, backed by the government(s), so that a user could easily exchange tokens for digitally managed receivables with a trusted independent service provider that is responsible for security. This way, the user does not have to carry all their holdings in physical tokens but can still readily use it for ad hoc payments to other users in proximity.

      A release ready MVP should include functionality such as different denominations of tokens and established ways of printing and distributing the tokens with strong safefuards against known threat actors. The tokens should have an intuitive UX so that it is easy to tell the value represented by each version of the physical token on offer. Token management in user space could be simplified by “wallets” (provided by third parties). Developers should consider a “make it rain” mode for initial beta, to attract interest to the project.

      I propose this new innovation be called monke, or the return to money.

      • example@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        20 hours ago

        GNU Taler is basically that. it is however exclusively for customer to merchant transactions, not user to user, to prevent money laundering.

  • Samskara@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I haven’t been able to successfully pay with it. It’s a terrible replacement for PayPal. That works with every bank and credit card. I have two bank accounts and one credit card linked to PayPal.

    Wero is an inconvenient failure.

    • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Do you work for PayPal or something? As of 09.2025 Wero processes 100M person-to-person transactions. That’s quite a number for an inconvenient failure.

  • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    I didn’t know Enterprise was an international enterprise.

    And of course there’s a fucking McDonald’s.