bdonvr@thelemmy.club to Linux Gaming@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agoLutris maintainer: "I've removed the Claude co-authorship from the commits a few days ago. So good luck figuring out what's generated and what is not."github.comexternal-linkmessage-square180fedilinkarrow-up1578arrow-down117file-text
arrow-up1561arrow-down1external-linkLutris maintainer: "I've removed the Claude co-authorship from the commits a few days ago. So good luck figuring out what's generated and what is not."github.combdonvr@thelemmy.club to Linux Gaming@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square180fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareMiaou@jlai.lulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10arrow-down1·9 hours agoNo, open weights changes nothing. Using stolen material is. Especially for a GPL project, a licence normally used to scare off corporate vultures. Why should anyone respect lutris’ licence, when they gave up on the authorship of their own product?
No, open weights changes nothing. Using stolen material is. Especially for a GPL project, a licence normally used to scare off corporate vultures. Why should anyone respect lutris’ licence, when they gave up on the authorship of their own product?