• wyldrstallyns@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    Way to bury the lede. 🖕🏼

    The executives “want it to be” because they’re paid to, and any outlet failing to state the simple fact outright belies their hidden bias. (ie. funding, influences, kompromat, etc.) The shareholders want it to be, and likewise up the chain.

    Follow the money trail. It all leads to billionaires, fellow plebs of the world. Guillotines, roll out. ✊🏼

    • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      How is it burying the lede when anyone with basic reading comprehension knows that’s what the headline’s obviously suggesting? Like sorry your reading comprehension is apparently trash, but that doesn’t mean GamesRadar did something wrong.

  • WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Take what’s happened as a warning to prepare yourself for the day humans really are replaceable. Start making significant changes to our societal structure now, or stash yourself some cyanide (or similar means of escaping this shitty plane of existence) - your choice.

  • DandomRude@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I’m pretty sure this technology will never have its moment in the spotlight because it can never, ever live up to the expectations that marketing has hyped up.

    After multibillion investments and a database that encompasses nearly everything humans have ever produced, the lofty promises have, as expected, failed to materialize. It’s simply nothing more than a tool that can certainly be used profitably. But its areas of application have absolutely nothing to do with what was promised to investors. It is simply not artificial intelligence, but a search engine that reproduces existing data or, upon request, assembles it into something that looks like it’s new, but is actually just a collage of what the model was fed.

    The fact that humans, in their way of being creative, naturally never operate outside the bounds of their own experience was exploited by marketing here to portray the probability calculations performed by LLMs as comparable to what we understand as intelligence. For LLMs, however, this is never achievable. It is merely an illusion built on the lack of understanding among so-called decision-makers.